An event seemingly meriting a second post in one day.
Although most who read these pages are probably already aware of this, today 58 former national security officials published a “Joint Declaration” disputing President Trump’s claim of a national emergency that justifies the diversion of federal funds to add further wall at our southern border. From a quick review of this Joint Declaration, it would appear that about a quarter of the signatories provided at least part of their national service to Republican Administrations, including three that served in the Trump Administration (although to be fair, two of the three were holdovers from the Obama Administration).
The Joint Declaration’s introduction provides in part:
“On February 15, 2019, the President declared a “national emergency” for the purpose of diverting appropriated funds from previously designated uses to build a wall along the southern border. We are aware of no emergency that remotely justifies such a step. The President’s actions are at odds with the overwhelming evidence in the public record, including the administration’s own data and estimates. We have lived and worked through national emergencies, and we support the President’s power to mobilize the Executive Branch to respond quickly in genuine national emergencies. But under no plausible assessment of the evidence is there a national emergency today that entitles the President to tap into funds appropriated for other purposes to build a wall at the southern border.”
A link to the Joint Declaration appears below.
I understand that a House Resolution terminating the National Emergency declared by the President will be passed by the House on Tuesday and sent to the Senate. Although there is no indication that if the Senate passes the measure it will survive a certain presidential veto, the most revealing part of this process will be ascertaining which and how many Republican Senators are willing to confront Mr. Trump, given indications that many have significant misgivings about what they reportedly consider an unwarranted presidential usurpation of Congressional power. This Joint Declaration will seemingly add to those misgivings. I will be watching Utah Sen. Mitt Romney.
4 thoughts on “Joint Declaration Disputing President Trump’s Emergency Declaration”
And watching Sen. Johnson of Wisconsin.
I think we have less chance of seeing Johnson do something useful in this situation than Aldo Leopold had of seeing the western grebe …
Couldn’t the vote on this Emergency Declaration also be seen as preliminary or test vote on who would be willing to impeach the president?
Hey! I guess we’ll see — but so many of our people are so anaesthetized by what Trump has done that absent a smoking gun, am wondering how many Republicans will stick their necks out; there would need to be 20 Republican votes in the Senate to actually remove him (assuming all Democrats will vote to impeach) . Have a great week!